THE STRONG
WAY - SUFFERING, HUMILIATION AND ULTIMATE TRIUMPH
Sermon delivered
on the 4th Sunday after Easter the 20th April 2008 by Fr Nicholas JG
Sykes in the congregation of St. Alban's Church of England, George
Town, Cayman Islands.
Scriptures: Acts
7: 55-60 1 Peter 2:
2-10 John 14: 1-14
1 Peter 2:4
"Come to Him, to that living stone, rejected by men but held by
God chosen and precious."
TRUE STRENGTH
It is good to
recall that there is in the final analysis a correspondence between
what is good and what is strong, and this recollection is I think
achieved by the Bible lessons today. We may become used to the idea
that it is evil rather than the good that is strong, because we do
indeed perceive many evils that seem to be strong, and often the good
is given a weak position from which it must proceed and overcome. But
because of the inherent strength of what is from God and therefore
good, it is able to prevail ultimately. Part of that strength
is a quality such as patient endurance. With such qualities the good
is able to tolerate the appearance of being weak or powerless, for as
long as it takes to prevail. And then and only then for many, its true
strength becomes apparent.
THE MINDS OF MEN
During the
latter part of our Lord's ministry among His disciples before the
Passion, part of their difficulty was that His great goodness seemed
sometimes to be weak rather than strong. In today's Gospel two of the
disciples contradict His sayings because, I suppose, they were not
ready to suspend their own judgment about them in favour of the trust
that Jesus was calling forth from them. When Jesus taught that the
disciples did already know the way He was going, Thomas said,
"No, we don't know." And when Jesus told them that they
already knew and had seen the Father, Philip chimed in and said
superfluously, "You show us the Father." The fact was
that their minds were still the minds of men and not the mind of
Christ. The disciples, towards the end of Jesus' ministry on earth,
were not ready, as quite often we are not ready, to move beyond their
own perceptions of victory for Jesus and themselves, to the point of
putting Him into the centre of their outlook, no matter what the
external prospects for that position might appear to be.
THE STRENGTH OF
JUDAS
This might go
some way towards explaining the mindset of the marginally and
supposedly "Christian" leaders one has at times seen who
consider that clearing out a large population of another religion or
culture from their midst by a campaign of terror and butchery
represents a victory for the Christian cause. This is more akin to the
strength that Judas Iscariot is believed to have wanted Jesus to
display, rather than the strength of the actual way of Jesus through
the cross and Resurrection. Great harm is always done to the Christian
cause in people's minds and hearts by these misguided progroms. For
this reason the Jewish people and others blame Christianity to some
extent for the evils of the Nazis' Jewish extermination policy. These
examples demonstrate that though the good may ultimately correspond
with the strong, as we believe it does, the strong is not necessarily
the good. What seems immediately strong may indeed be Satanically
evil.
THE MIND OF
CHRIST ON VICTORY
So it is
critically important for us at this time to move beyond our own
perception of victory for Jesus and for ourselves, to putting Him into
the centre of our outlook, to baptise our minds into the death and
Resurrection of Christ, so that the whole concept of Christian victory
is converted to encompass the truth that God so loved the world,
including our enemies, that He gave His only Son, that whoever
will believe in Him, including those of the enemy camp, should not
perish but have eternal life. The cross and the Resurrection of Christ
show us that this is the strong position the Church must take about
every matter, no matter what the implications of it on the ground
might be. The suspension of judgment that is called for by such a
position involves trust, a walk by faith rather than sight, the walk
that characterises all truly Christian positions. We are called, for
instance, as children of the Resurrection, to take a position over the
deliberate as well as in some cases unwitting secularisation of the
Cayman Islands by the powers that be. We are called, also, as children
of the Resurrection, to defend the Church of England in the Cayman
Islands. We should bear in mind that the positions and defences that
we set up are diminished by attitudes on our part of superiority and
contempt for the powers-that-be either of church and state that are
hooked with the ideologies of our day. For thirdly, we are called, as
children of the Resurrection, to walk as individuals consistently with
our baptismal privileges and vows. These areas represent mighty areas
of battle, and I suggest that all of us, being children of the
Resurrection, are called to the battleground. It is necessary to have
the correct strategy for our battles, because nothing less than
ultimate triumph will do for the outcome, though suffering and
humiliation for us may more quickly appear. We must perceive correctly
the shape of Christian victory, being neither deceived by false
substitutes nor deluded into foregoing the ultimate triumph.
THE STRENGTH OF
THE FAITHFUL
As we were
thinking at the beginning, the readings today remind us of the
ultimate correspondence, no matter how things often seem to be
contrary to it, between the good and the strong. Terror and butchery,
as well as cynical deception, are evil, their appearance of strength
is satanic and not real, and ultimately such things are mortally weak.
Our first lesson, a portion of the account of the martyrdom of St.
Stephen, reminds us that in a time of the direst personal subjection
to terror, what prevails comes forth from the obedience that a man of
faith renders to God. We know little or nothing of Stephen’s family
or social life: just that he was a full of faith and of the Holy
Spirit. It was this that prevailed over the fury of his persecutors,
though in the eyes of those who appeared to be strong, it was he who
appeared to be weak and foolish. But as the saying goes, he who has
the last laugh, laughs loudest. At the close of his earthly life,
Stephen was given a vision of the Christ, standing at the right hand
of God, welcoming him into the courts of heaven. Then Stephen gave his
attackers the ultimate challenge of words that recalled to them the
words of the Christ they had condemned, and of forgiveness in a
similar spirit to Christ’s. That martyrdom, we should recall, was
witnessed by Saul, the great persecutor, who subsequently became a
great apostle, and his key ideas as an apostle one can even see
foreshadowed in the great speech that St. Stephen gave to his
attackers. Our New Testament lesson refers to Jesus Christ as the
cornerstone laid in Zion, applying Old Testament imagery of strength,
security and defence to the Risen and Living Lord. So as St. Peter
says, Christ is that living stone, to whom we are called to come, and
be made ourselves living stones built within the spiritual House of
God, God's holy and priestly people. We are called to be little rocks,
little stones after the pattern of the Big Rock, the Big Stone that is
Christ our Lord. The Christian position, the truly Christian
world-view, is the strongest one of all, the one that endures through
the failure of all others, no matter how strong they might appear, and
no matter how weak and corrupted the Christian Church appears at any
time to become. For after all, even through the death of all deaths,
the living Christ was raised, and will prevail. We too in our time are
to be little Christs, and though called also to die, we are to conquer
and prevail.
QUESTIONS
1. Give some
examples from your own personal experience of the good, in spite of
appearances, being stronger than the evil.
2. List some
biblical instances of good prevailing over evil.
3. Can the
"truly Christian position" be distinguished from positions
taken by the Christian Church, or do these positions actually define
what Christianity is? Can Christians set themselves up in judgment
over their Church?