BELIEF AND
ITS CONSEQUENCES
Sermon delivered
on the First Sunday after Easter the 30th March 2008 by Fr
Nicholas JG Sykes in the congregations of St. Alban's, George Town and
St. Mary’s, Cayman Brac - Church of England in the Cayman Islands.
Scriptures: Acts
2: 14a, 22-32 1 Peter 1: 3 -
9 S. John 20: 19 - 31
1 Peter 1:8
"Without having seen Him, you love Him; though you do not now see
Him, believing in Him you rejoice with unutterable and exalted
joy."
THE UNCOVERING
OF THE REAL BELIEF
It is often said
that actions speak louder than words. As John Newman taught many years
ago, both words and actions flow from a man's real belief. A person's
belief, whether it be right or wrong, true or untrue, will not remain
hidden, but will be revealed in his actions.
This is the case
for individuals, for Churches and for countries. What we do will
reveal, for instance, whether we truly believe that the crucified
Jesus was raised incorruptible. The Church officially says,
"That's true." We say, "That's true": for we say
it every time we say the Creed. The United Kingdom, the Cayman Islands
and many other countries say, "That's true" when they make
Easter Monday a public holiday every year, representing their nod of
the head to the meaning of Christian Easter. Such belief is truly
blessed, as Jesus affirmed: "Blessed are those who have not seen,
and yet believe." The voices of unbelief and betrayal, though,
like the tares in the midst of the wheat, are strong, and the social
philosophy of multiculturalism is often given to justify them. In
spite of the orthodox creeds of the Church, there are voices high in
positions of authority in the Churches who teach that the Resurrection
of Jesus is essentially only a symbol of human renewal, only a symbol
that faith can triumph over defeat, and that the greatness of Jesus
lay not in His victory but in His faithfulness to Himself through
ultimate defeat. Furthermore, it is dangerous, these voices contend,
to think of the Resurrection as an event unique to the one Man Jesus
Christ, because that would mean that Jesus was in a unique manner the
way to God; however, in a multi-cultural society one cannot but teach
that all the religions of mankind teach some truth about the pathway
to God. So the solution, say these voices, is to demythologise the
Resurrection of Jesus Christ, ignore and discard the recorded witness
to it, assume that its meaning is nothing unique to Jesus of Nazareth,
and take it as applying with equal validity to man in general.
Resurrection is then taught as the great symbol of man's inherent
capacity to rise up and conquer all that oppresses him. Thus at
Toronto's West Hill United Church this Easter it has been reported
that instead of the words of the Easter hymn, "Jesus Christ Has
Risen Today - Hallelujah", what is being sung this year is
"Glorious Hope has risen today - Halleluiah."
RECOGNISE THE
INFLUENCE OF THE NEW WORLD-VIEW
This is one of
the very neatest ways of undermining and betraying the Faith once
delivered and renewed by the Holy Spirit, age after age, in every
generation up to the present day. It is critically important for us to
recognise this to be occurring; as faith can still prevent a slide
into the spiritual and ethical morass resulting from this process. The
assumptions of a radically multi-cultural world-view are being brought
to bear heavily upon a small community like Cayman that traditionally
identifies itself as "Christian". This process has been
becoming increasingly visible and tangible here, and Cayman’s hour
of trial has now apparently come. The ticking time-bomb of radical
secularism, which if it is not given the necessary rebuttal by you and
others in Christian congregations, is capable of blowing our Christian
identification to smithereens and carrying down the society into
chaos. The Cayman Islands, like the United Kingdom and other great
societies, must not be afraid to regard itself as a Christian home in
which Christians especially but also those other than Christian may
find a welcome; and must refute the notion of being an amorphous
doss-house without any principles of its own by which lodgers may be
guided.
LOSS OF BELIEF
IN THE RESURRECTION UNCOVERED IN THE CHURCH
The loss of
belief in the Resurrection of Jesus Christ goes to the root of our
deepest ills as individuals, as the Church and as the Christian West.
St. Paul taught that the risen life of Christ organically empowers the
life that we ourselves may and must possess as members of His Body.
Our spiritual walk is the calling to be transformed from being
"in Adam" to being "in Christ ". It is this life
that gives us the power to act as His disciples and as members of His
risen and ascended Body. His risen life is the bounty from which the
Holy Spirit draws graces to bestow on each of us who have died and
risen again with Him by water and the Spirit. As St. Peter says in the
2nd lesson today, God in His great mercy gave us new birth to a living
hope by the Resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead. The
Resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead has regenerated us to a
living hope. The power of the Resurrection is like the restoration of
electrical power in an area whose power lines have been down for some
time, a circumstance which many of us can remember. There is actual
power in the Resurrection of Jesus Christ, to which we do not have
access if we are cut off from it through disbelief. If the
Resurrection of Jesus Christ is not to be believed, then the Church's
doctrine all falls apart, because there is no witness to the atoning
efficacy of Jesus' Sacrifice. Then there would be no assurance of
divine forgiveness, no regeneration of a living hope within us, and
the Eucharist would be a mockery, because you cannot give thanks as a
memorial to the defeat of the good by the evil.
DOCTRINAL
COLLAPSE
Without a belief
in the Resurrection of Jesus, our apprehension of the Incarnation
falls also. The doctrine of the Incarnation is the teaching that the
Son, the eternal Word of God, took to Himself the nature of Man in the
womb of the Virgin Mary, so that in Christ the Godhead and the Manhood
were joined together in one Person. The Resurrection of Christ
witnesses to this also, because if there were no Resurrection, Man
would not have been eternally taken into God and the God-Man
Personhood of our Lord would have been dissolved at His death.
THE RENEWAL OF
TRADITIONAL BELIEF
In one way or
another, and not only in Toronto, the mainline Churches today are
characterised by a loss of their essential doctrines. For years the
Church's spokesmen have been more than hesitant to declare their
theological groundwork. This is exactly what must be expected with a
loss of belief in the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. Nevertheless,
growing like a germinated seed in the midst of the chaotic Church
scene today is the phenomenon of traditional belief, and it is my
earnest hope, trust and effort that we are part of this growth too. In
the context of the Cayman society the seed mission of our church is to
tend and feed the life of the community of Cayman at its Christian
root. This could be called the practice of Christian radicalism. Yet
still there will be no renewal of any sort, and our own calling as a
Church will be unattainable, if belief in the Resurrection of Jesus of
Nazareth is not amongst us. Without seeing Him, love Him, believe Him
and rejoice! says St. Peter. It is the Resurrection of Jesus Christ
that regenerates us to a living hope. Our hope of renewal and
reconstruction as individuals, as the church and as a Christian
society rests squarely upon the Resurrection of our Lord.
QUESTIONS
1. Is there a
basic conflict between the modern world-view and faith in the
Resurrection of Jesus Christ? If so, what is the nature of the
conflict? (Necessary, imaginary, objective, subjective?)
2. How does the
Resurrection undergird the covenant relational view of Man rather than
an individual rights view?
3. What are some
of the characteristics of European radical secularism?
4. What
Christian characteristics of the Cayman society would you like to see
preserved? What failures to live up to this might make it more vulnerable
to secularism?